The New Criterion

It operates as a refuge for a civilizing element in short supply in contemporary America: honest criticism
- The Wall Street Journal

Letters

September 2008

"Free speech in an age of jihad": a response

by Stanley Kurtz

Stanley Kurtz responds:

Reynolds defense, yet later acknowledges substantial differences between British and American law. So what looks like a claim that Ehrenfeld will get de facto American treatment in Britain is actually a call for American authors to submit to British law. Even the vaunted Reynolds defense—no true equivalent to American law—is under pressure from Mr. Justice Eady, and cannot be relied upon.

British libel law is a problem, not because of its nineteenth-century sources, but because it challenges the fundamental principle that the burden of proof ought to rest on the accuser, rather than the accused. British libel law can also be exploited to suppress political debate, as it was in the McLibel case. Blackburn fails to address the substance of the “McLibel” point, and, if anything, seems to favor the disturbing British decision in that case. Although Blackburn rejects indigence as a defense, he resorts to it implicitly when juxtaposing “powerful media corporations and their prey.”

So Blackburn, who so clearly dislikes American law, would impose British standards on American authors. Yet he can neither own up to the fact that this is what he is doing, acknowledge the precarious status of the Reynolds defense he so touts, nor speak to the potential abuse of British libel law as a tool to stifle political debate.

Blackburn frames the issue as America versus Britain, yet British libel law has drawn very serious calls for reform in Britain itself. This debate is ongoing both within and between nations, and the internet will force it toward some general resolution, explicit or implicit. I prefer to acknowledge the growing problem and openly make the case for my preferred resolution. Blackburn would hide the internationalist legal ambition implicit in his stance. Yet this is no longer possible. Either wealthy, internet-enabled libel tourists will force plaintiff-friendly British law on the entire world, or the world itself will rebel, then rethink and reform its laws to prevent this.

Stanley Kurtz
Washington, D.C.

Stanley Kurtz
more from this author

This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 27 September 2008, on page 79

Copyright © 2008 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com

http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/-Free-speech-in-an-age-of-jihad--a-response-3903
rate this article for your user profile

E-mail to friend

Subscriber login

The New Criterion

The New Criterion is now optimized for Mobile Devices

Already a print subscriber? click for online access

login

Remember:

You might also enjoy

Most popular

view more >

download
first delivery

New from The New Criterion:
40 page special issue
on our conference

‘Free speech in
an age of Jihad’

Events

January 25 2009

TRAVEL EVENT: The New Criterion Cruise


Webcasts

The Milt Rosenberg Show: Free Speech in an age of Jihad
Roger Kimball, David Yezzi, and James Panero discuss the New Criterion special pamphlet "Free Speech in an Age of Jihad." From the Milt Rosenberg Show, WGN. Recorded live in the Chicago studios 8/14/2008.


Roger Kimball on liberalism's response to Islam
From an evening with the Illinois chapter of the Friends of The New Criterion. Recorded on 8/16/2008.


Encounter Books at 10, an interview with Roger Simon

Weblog