Quite simply, the best cultural review in the world
All in the family
by Bruce Bawer
On the life and work of Marianne Moore
was right!Support The
In the opening pages of Charles Molesworth’s 1990 biography of Marianne Moore, the reader encounters two exceedingly curious sentences. “I have chosen,” declares Molesworth in the first of these, “to limit my interpretations of [Moore’s] character by relying more on literary than on psychological questions.” Study that statement for a moment—savor it, if you will—and ponder its meaning. What is Molesworth saying here? Apparently, that he not only thinks a biographer can somehow “interpret” his subject’s “character” while skirting “psychological questions,” but also that for some reason he has found this course of action to be advisable. Which, of course, raises the questions: Exactly how does one go about interpreting ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 32 April 2014, on page 12
Copyright © 2015 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/All-in-the-family-7866
E-mail to friend
A deeper look into In a Station of the Metro reveals much about Pound's development as a poet.
by David Yezzi
Poets, like journalists, historians, are after the truth. But what kind of truth, exactly, do we find in poetry?
by Paul Dean
On Cambridge University Press's seven-volume collection of Ben Jonson's works.
April 29 2015
Edmund Burke Award Gala
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"