America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
Notes & Comments
But is it art?
On art: context, meaning, and vandalism
was right!Support The
A couple of months ago in this space, we said farewell to Arthur Danto, the philosopher and art critic, who died last fall at eighty-nine. Professor Danto had interests in philosophy that were distinct from his interest in art, but there was one area of overlap. It revolved around the question “What is art?” Professor Danto had many clever things to say about this question, particularly in his book The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (1981). Why is it, he wondered, that one red square is just a red square while another, visually indistinguishable from the first, is Number 34, a contemporary abstract masterpiece in the collection of the Museum of Modern Art? Or imagine two additional red sq ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 32 March 2014, on page 1
Copyright © 2015 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/But-is-it-art--7835
E-mail to friend
On the green movement's latest agenda.
Has the First Amendment completely disappeared from college campuses?
Comparing Pope Francis with his predecessor.
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"