America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
Notes & Comments
On the sad spectacle of graffiti in the musuem.
was right!Support The
Of all spurious forms of contemporary art, perhaps the most ostentatiously disagreeable is so-called “graffiti art.” What it represents is the elevation of a public nuisance into a protected and adulated form of creative endeavor. Because it has its origin in an activity that involves a contempt for private property, its rebirth as art—a specially venerated species of property—involves all manner of contradictions, not to say hypocritical evasions, on the part of those who practice and those who hawk and display the stuff. In the Spring issue of City Journal, Heather Mac Donald, taking off from an exhibition of such “street art” at the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art, provides a long and patient demolition of this form of urban squalor masquerading as art.
What’s particularly irritating about graffiti art is the way it enshrines something that is both hideous to look at
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 29 May 2011, on page 2
Copyright © 2015 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Defacement-art-7027
E-mail to friend
On the green movement's latest agenda.
Has the First Amendment completely disappeared from college campuses?
Comparing Pope Francis with his predecessor.
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"