FeaturesGeoffrey Scott is a spectral figure in twentieth-century English literary culture. I have known people who have read Robert Skidelsky’s biography of John Maynard Keynes, Meryle Secrest’s biography of Bernard Berenson, and R. W. B. Lewis’s biography of Edith Wharton, in each of which Scott merits several mentions, yet who do not thereafter recall Scott’s name. It is in part that Scott was that type of mercurial belletrist whose body of work comprises diverse projects known principally to specialists in given areas. Thus, the expert on Johnson and Boswell will certainly know of Scott. The expert in the theory of classical architecture will know of Scott. The expert on eighteenth-century French literature is likely to have heard of Scott. But to the general fan of literary biographies Scott’s just another in the long list of people—hangers-on, adventurers, dilettantes—whom famous people slept with. It’s a pit ... This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchaseSubscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 25 June 2007, on page 20 Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Geoffrey-Scott---3181
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
On Robert A. M. Stern's New York 2000: Architecture and Urbanism between the Bicentennial and the Millennium. A review of Up from Zero: Politics, Architecture and the Rebuilding of Ground Zero, by Paul Goldberger. A review of Walks and Talks of an American Farmer in England, by Frederick Law Olmsted. Christopher, for better & for worse On the critic, polemicist & raconteur Christopher Hitchens (1949–2011).
Webcasts
Anthony Daniels on the Euro Crisis
Andrew C. McCarthy: The Muslim Threat
Roger Kimball: The Grim Future of Statism Weblog 
|
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {register now}