America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
FeaturesJanuary 2009 Guarding the boundaries On the moral consequences of relativism (from "The Dictatorship of Relativism.") Since I’ve received no education in philosophy whatever, it is no doubt very rash of me to make a broad generalization concerning the subject, but I shall risk it nonetheless: that in the whole history of philosophy not a single important philosophical problem has ever been solved beyond all possible dispute. I know that the late Sir Karl Popper claimed to have solved the problem of induction not merely to his own satisfaction, but also to the satisfaction of all rational men; alas, I do not think that all rational men have reciprocated by agreeing with him. Pace Popper, the philosophy of science is not now at an end, any more than is mental, political, or moral philosophy. Unless I am much mistaken, the metaphysical foundations of aesthetic and moral judgment have not been established with anything like the certainty with which, say, the circulation of the blood has been established. I know that it ... This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchaseSubscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 27 January 2009, on page 9 Copyright © 2009 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Guarding-the-boundaries-3979
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
view more >
New from The New Criterion: "Free speech in EventsJuly 16 2009 OPEN CHICAGO EVENT Webcasts
"Taking the Occasion," poems by Daniel Brown
Jay Nordlinger on the future of classical music, from an evening with the Friends of The New Criterion.
A profile of the abstract painter Thornton WIllis |
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {SIGN IN} {register now}