Quite simply, the best cultural review in the world
Notes & Comments
Brandeis' treatment of Hirsi Ali shows just how repressive the "free-speech movement" truly is.
was right!Support The
We have often had occasion in these pages to remark on the irony that the “free-speech movement,” which began in 1964 in the tumult of Berkeley, has over the years mutated into something close to the opposite: an anti-free-speech movement. It is not at all uncommon, on our nation’s campuses, to find academics decrying academic freedom in the name of a putative higher virtue. Consider, to take just one example, the Harvard professor of French who opined at an “anti-racism” conference that “professors should have less freedom of expression than writers and artists, because professors are supposed to be creating a better world.”
A simil ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 32 May 2014, on page 1
Copyright © 2014 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Illiberal-liberalism-7885
E-mail to friend
On our special art issue.
Why everyone should learn the ancient languages.
Yale president Peter Salovey takes a stand for free speech.
December 18 2014
Friends, young friends, and authors event: Holiday Party 2014
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"