The New Criterion is probably more consistently worth reading than any other magazine in English.
NotebookMay 2008 Ionesco & the limits of philosophy On Le roi se meurt by Eugène Ionesco and the philosophy of Owen Flanagan. Recently I read a short polemical book by a political philosopher in which he claimed that the works of Shakespeare, while entertaining and emotionally engaging, lacked intellectual content by comparison with the works of the great philosophers. If it were wisdom and knowledge that one was after, it was to the latter that one would turn. Literature was for entertainment, intelligent or not as the case might be. What applied to Shakespeare must, a fortiori, apply to all other literature, for by general consent the works of Shakespeare contain the richest description of the human condition ever written. Nor do we seriously expect that body of work ever to be surpassed. This being the case, philosophy was for thinkers, literature for those in need of light relief from the hard work of genuine thought. This view, with which I am not sympathetic, supposes that everything truly important can be said, or is best said, in straightforwardly p ... This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchaseSubscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 26 May 2008, on page 91 Copyright © 2010 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Ionesco---the-limits-of-philosophy-3851
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
A critical account of the "Chernyshevsky of individualism." On the intellectual irresponsibility of Soviet sympathizers. Bartók, Parry & Lord: a flawed legacy Debunking the myth of "Homeric" Balkan folk songs. Webcasts
Elucidations & Corrections: Arts Criticism
Swallow Anthology Reading at The Grolier
New Criterion-Social Affairs Unit Conference: Part 4 |
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {register now}