The New Criterion is probably more consistently worth reading than any other magazine in English.
FeaturesMay 2008 On the sadness of higher education On comparing the university life then with now. The academic world that I first encountered was one of both intellectual beauty and profound flaws. I was taught at Princeton, in the early 1960s—in history and literature, above all—before the congeries that we term “the Sixties” began. Most of my professors were probably men of the Left—that’s what the surveys tell me—but that fact was never apparent to me, because, except in rare cases, their politics or even their ideological leanings were not inferable from their teaching or syllabi. Reasoned and informed dissent from professorial devil’s advocacy or interpretation was encouraged and rewarded, including challenges to the very terms of an examination question. In retrospect, professors who must have disagreed fundamentally with works such as David Donald’s Lincoln Reconsidered (with its celebrated explanation of the abolitionists’ contempt for Lincoln in terms of the loss of status ... This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchaseSubscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 26 May 2008, on page 9 Copyright © 2010 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/On-the-sadness-of-higher-education-3831
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
A critical account of the "Chernyshevsky of individualism." On the godfather of modern conservatism & his intellectual legacy. Webcasts
Elucidations & Corrections: Arts Criticism
Swallow Anthology Reading at The Grolier
New Criterion-Social Affairs Unit Conference: Part 4 |
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {register now}