America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
Notes & Comments
Shut up, they explained
On the "disinvitation" of commencement speakers, trigger warnings for classic literature, and privilege
was right!Support The
Last month, reflecting on the dismal significance of Brandeis University’s decision to rescind its invitation to have Ayaan Hirsi Ali speak at its commencement ceremony, we noted the irony that what began as the free-speech movement in Berkeley in 1964 evolved into the politically correct, conformity-for-all movement that reigns supreme on college campuses today. As we write, it is the high tide of what Greg Lukianoff, the President of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), calls the “disinvitation season.” Ms. Hirsi Ali is but one of many casualties. The distinguished scholar Charles Murray found himself disinvited (“postponed” was the euphemism of choice) from Azusa Pacific University last month even as former Secretary of State Condoleezza R ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 32 June 2014, on page 1
Copyright © 2014 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Shut-up--they-explained-7915
E-mail to friend
Attitudes about patriotism, race, and more prove that The Sixties are still with us.
A special message to our supporters
Brandeis' treatment of Hirsi Ali shows just how repressive the "free-speech movement" truly is.
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"