It operates as a refuge for a civilizing element in short supply in contemporary America: honest criticism
A review of Stravinsky's Ballets (Yale Music Masterworks) by Professor Charles M. Joseph
was right!Support The
By his own account, Igor Stravinsky’s earliest childhood memory was the sound of winter ice cracking on the River Neva. Stravinsky’s music—mercurially pent, formally explosive—sounded a similarly violent and resonant note in the twentieth century. Known for his wide-ranging works, by turns classical and revolutionary, he first made his mark with three dances written for Serge Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes: The Firebird (1910), Petrushka (1911/1947), and The Rite of Spring (1913).
As Charles M. Joseph observes, ninety percent of Stravinsky’s music has been put to work and play in ballets. His The Rite of Spring alone has so far led to more than two hundred dances since the first, Vaslav Nijinsky’s. “I have always had a horror of listening to music with my eyes shut, with nothing for them to do,” Stravinsky wrote. “The sight of gestures and movements of the various parts of the body producing the music is fundamentally necessary if it is to be grasped in all its fullness.”
In this firmly argued study of ballets with music by Stravinsky, Joseph strikes a balance between a close inspection of the scores and an anecdotal summoning of the conditions under which they came to be. (Admittedly, there could have been more of such anecdotes. One misses, for example, the image of the composer working away on the tumultuous The Rite of Spring in the remarkably confining garret-like space above a tidy Swiss village, as seen in Tony Palmer’s 1982 documentary, “Stravinsky: Once at the Border.”) Joseph retrieves useful details of Stravinsky’s lifelong collaborative efforts with Diaghilev, Nijinsky, Bronislava Nijinska, George Balanchine, and more. Of Balanchine and Stravinsky, he notes, persuasively, “[T]hese two artists had achieved a counterpoint of minds.”
Stravinsky’s collaborations occasionally produced controversy as well as dance. Joseph recounts these bouts without taking sides unduly. Despite Stravinsky’s known penchant for ballet, he was wont to fall in—and out—of love with it. He was also likely to contradict himself. Even after the succès de scandale of Rite, he complained bitterly about Nijinsky’s lack of formal musical training as an impediment both to himself and to the dancers. In 1921, a few years later, he “pronounced ballet bankrupt as an expressive art form,” Joseph reports. Of L’Histoire du soldat (1918), Stravinsky declared, as Joseph puts it, “that the dancing had been inserted simply to prevent monotony.” Moreover, Stravinsky believed “that there had in fact been too much of it.”
Regardless of his subject’s paradoxes, Joseph offers an orderly analysis of the ideas guiding Stravinsky. When appraising the composer’s visions and revisions, Joseph takes care to emphasize structural preoccupations and their demands. His chapter about Agon, the 1957 Stravinsky-Balanchine collaboration, offers a case in point. Like others including Robert Craft, Joseph credits the influence of T. S. Eliot and Sweeney Agonistes on this piece, as well as classical literary sources: “A devoted student of linguistic morphology, the composer once again heeded the flow of language, syllabification, accent, meter, and inflection.” Beyond this, as Joseph recounts, Lincoln Kirstein’s recommendation to Stravinsky of François de Lauze’s Apologie de la danse (1623) “provided a lexicon of protocol” in courtly classicism that was to guide Agon’s composition. Joseph’s compact writing does not sacrifice nuance: His reckoning of the oft-told reception of Rite is superior to most.
Joseph lets his metaphors run away with him at times, as when he describes an audience of French artists as “among the first to hear the embryo of a [Stravinsky] masterpiece.” He also succumbs to certain clichés about the cultural scene of the day: “Buoyed by the artistic vigor of Paris, his beliefs resonated with the passionate conviction of other young modernists seeking to refashion the thinking of a new generation.” Curiously, too, the author and his editor consistently prefer the stilted word “embracement” to “embrace.”
Joseph has, however, created a graphically vivid portrait of the artist; during a rehearsal, Stravinsky can be seen “leaping on the piano as if it were a dangerous force.” Stravinsky offered profusely intelligent suggestions to choreographers, impresarios, costumers, and set designers alike. His dances were certainly not his alone, yet they were very often co-owned. Indeed, for L’Histoire du soldat Stravinsky “perhaps jokingly considered dancing the role of the Devil himself.”
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 30 April 2012, on page 74
Copyright © 2014 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Stravinsky-s-ice-7341
E-mail to friend
On "Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes, 1909–1929: When Art Danced with Music” at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C.
"Baltimore Inspired by Poe" & "Edgar Allan Poe: A Baltimore Icon 1809–1849" at the Baltimore Museum of Art & "Edgar Allan Poe: More Than a Poet" at Enoch Pratt Free Library, Baltimore.
November 12 2014
Friends and Young Friends Event: Book Launch Party with Andrew Roberts
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"