The New Criterion
America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
- Harry Mount, the London Telegraph
Notes & CommentsJanuary 2009 The art market bubble On the folly of speculating on contemporary art. What’s the silliest thing you have heard in the past year or two? Take your time. Our candidate comes from Tobias Meyer, Sotheby’s head of contemporary art, who declared in 2007 that “the best art is the most expensive because the market is so smart.” Now, we are great admirers of the wisdom of the market. But would even the most doctrinaire free-marketeer—one, anyway, not dazzled by the glitter of the contemporary art world—argue that market price determined aesthetic value? The philosopher David Hume famously argued that “durable appreciation,” not any intrinsic quality, ultimately provided the measure of artistic value. Whether Hume was correct is a matter of dispute. But at least he placed the locus of value in long-term public judgment and delectation, not sticker price. We came across that quotation from Mr. Meyer in “A Second Tulip Mania,” an artic ... This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchaseSubscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 27 January 2009, on page 2 Copyright © 2010 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-art-market-bubble-3978
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
On the Met's new galleries dedicated to art from the "Arab Lands, Turkey, Iran, Central Asia, and Late South Asia." On linguistic timorousness off the Timor coast. On the costs of contemporary college education.  The New Criterion is now optimized for Mobile Devices 
Webcasts
Elucidations & Corrections: Arts Criticism
Swallow Anthology Reading at The Grolier
New Criterion-Social Affairs Unit Conference: Part 4 |
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {register now}