Sign in  |  Register

The New Criterion

It operates as a refuge for a civilizing element in short supply in contemporary America: honest criticism
- The Wall Street Journal

Features

May 2003

The hypocrisy of Noam Chomsky

by Keith Windschuttle

There’s a famous definition in the Gospels of the hypocrite, and the hypocrite is the person who refuses to apply to himself the standards he applies to others. By that standard, the entire commentary and discussion of the so-called War on Terror is pure hypocrisy, virtually without exception. Can anybody understand that? No, they can’t understand it.
—Noam Chomsky, Power and Terror, 2003

Noam Chomsky was the most conspicuous American intellectual to rationalize the Al Qaeda terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. The death toll, he argued, was minor compared to the list of Third World victims of the “far more extreme terrorism” of United States foreign policy. Despite its calculated affront to mainstream opinion, this sentiment went down very well with Chomsky’s own constituency. He has never been more popular among the academic and intellectual left than he ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Subscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions)

Subscribe to TNC (Online only)

Purchase article credit and clip this article

If you already have an account login first

Keith Windschuttle's latest book is The White Australia Policy (Macleay Press). His website is www.sydneyline.com.


more from this author

This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 21 May 2003, on page 4

Copyright © 2015 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com

http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-hypocrisy-of-Noam-Chomsky-1733

E-mail to friend


The New Criterion

By the author

An enemy within

by Keith Windschuttle

How to protect speech when the freedom is abused.

Anglosphere exceptionalism

by Keith Windschuttle

Samuel Huntington, civilizations, and what makes the English-speaking people great

You might also enjoy

Remembering Robert Conquest

by John O'Sullivan

Remembering Robert Conquest's literary life.

Liberty’s charter

by Jeremy Black

On the special significance of Magna Carta for Americans.

The untold story of Reconstruction

by Gene Dattel

The South is largely blamed for the failure of Reconstruction, but what of the North's responsibility?

Most popular

view more >

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

Events

September 29 2015

Friends and Young Friends Event: Book Launch Party with Peter Pettus


October 02 2015

Friends and Young Friends Event: "The Corruption of our Political Institutions," a symposium


Webcasts

The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
On May 5, 2014, The New Criterion and PJ Media presented the second Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity. The award is given to highlight egregious examples of dishonest reporting. Also awarded this year was the Rather, a new award for lifetime achievement in mendacious journalism.
The Duranty Prize is named after Walter Duranty, the New York Times Moscow corresponded in the 1920s and 1930s who whitewashed Joseph Stalin’s forced starvation of the Ukrainians (the Holodomor) and many other aspects of Soviet oppression. Duranty was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for his efforts. It has never been revoked.
Audio copyright Ed Driscoll, www.eddriscoll.com.


Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
Roger Kimball introduces The Kennedy Phenomenon, a conference presented by The New Criterion on Tuesday, November 19.


The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"
Roger Kimball reads Peter Collier’s paper on oft-overlooked unsavory details of the Kennedys' lives. Much of the paper is drawn from Collier’s book, coauthored with David Horowitz, The Kennedys: An American Drama.