America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
FeaturesTen years ago John Heath and I wrote a lament for the decline of classical learning in the university—Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom. We sounded three simple themes. First, that the study of Western civilization and the appreciation of its literature, art, values, and ideas hinge on acknowledging the singular contributions of the classical Greeks and Romans. Second, that classicists themselves had shied away from advocating the study of the classical world. Instead, a new careerism encouraged the avoidance of teaching undergraduates, while rewarding scholarly overspecialization and its counterfeit antidote—postmodern, politically correct “theory.” As a result, university students were not learning much about classics. And the public had little interest in reading from their professors about the racism, sexism, and homophobia of the founders of West ... This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchaseSubscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 26 May 2008, on page 21 Copyright © 2010 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-new-learning-that-failed-3833
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
On Masters & Commanders: How Four Titans Won the War in the West , by Andrew Roberts. On The Seventh Decade: The New Shape of Nuclear Danger by Jonathan Schell. A critical account of the "Chernyshevsky of individualism." On the godfather of modern conservatism & his intellectual legacy. Webcasts
Elucidations & Corrections: Arts Criticism
Swallow Anthology Reading at The Grolier
New Criterion-Social Affairs Unit Conference: Part 4 |
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {register now}