America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
Notes & Comments
The rot at Duke
was right!Support The
Many readers will recall our reporting on the “Duke rape case” in May 2007. In that specimen of academic political correctness, three Duke lacrosse players were indicted on (as it turned out) false charges of kidnapping and raping a black stripper. The case demonstrated not only the extent to which a public servant was willing to barter the lives of others to advance his career— the name of then–District Attorney Michael Nifong definitively entered the rolls of infamy—but also the herd-like and accusatorial mentality of the so-called “mainstream” media and professoriate.
What a rush there was to find those students guilty! The Boston Globe, The New York Times, and many other organs of enlightenment thundered their condemnation. As for the academy itself, the rot started at the top. Richard Brodhead, Duke’s president, followed the herd in embracing the principle that one is ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 28 January 2010, on page 3
Copyright © 2015 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-rot-at-Duke-4355
E-mail to friend
Our inability to speak freely makes it impossible to comprehend the dangerous realities we face.
Reactions to the Charlie Hebdo attacks reveal the limits of free speech.
On the fall of The New Republic.
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"