America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
FeaturesOctober 1995 The sensational Miss Alcott On Louisa May Alcott's sensational novels. As soon as she went to her room, [Jo] got out her papers, and carefully re-read every one of her stories… . “They are trash, and will soon be worse than trash if I go on; for each is more sensational than the last. I’ve gone blindly on, hurting myself and other people, for the sake of money;—I know it’s so—for I can’t read this stuff in sober earnest without being horribly ashamed of it; and what should I do if they were seen at home, or Mr. Bhaer got hold of them?” Could Louisa May Alcott really have worried that her writings were trash? Could she have felt that they were just sensational rubbish produced for pelf? Was it possible that the author of Little Women: or, Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy (1868–69)—that classic of ninete ...
Subscribe to TNC (Print and Online editions) Subscribe to TNC (Online only) This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 14 October 1995, on page 15 Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-sensational-Miss-Alcott-4217
rate this article for your user profile
E-mail to friend
|
The achievement of Ralph Ellison On the career of Ralph Ellison and The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison edited by John F. Callahan. A consideration of the author upon publication of his book The Atonement & Other Stories A review of William Faulkner: The Making of a Modernist by Daniel J. Singal Christopher, for better & for worse On the critic, polemicist & raconteur Christopher Hitchens (1949–2011). Webcasts
Anthony Daniels on the Euro Crisis
Andrew C. McCarthy: The Muslim Threat
Roger Kimball: The Grim Future of Statism |
add a comment
you must have an account to post a comment. {register now}