The New Criterion is probably more consistently worth reading than any other magazine in English.
What Dido did, Satan saw & O’Keeffe painted
How the humanities can come out on top in the education debate
was right!Support The
In April 1981, The New York Times Book Review published an essay by the literary theorist Geoffrey Hartman that proposed a whole different model of academic criticism. Whereas traditional criticism served the primary text, aiming to clarify, elucidate, and otherwise expound on the original, Hartman argued that “new kinds of commentary” possess an “expressive force” and mark an “inventive feat, a ‘creative’ rather than a definit ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 32 November 2013, on page 4
Copyright © 2014 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/What-Dido-did--Satan-saw---O-Keeffe-painted---7728
E-mail to friend
A review of "What's Liberal about the Liberal Arts?" by Michael BÃ©rubÃ©.
John Maynard Keynes’s revisionist history of World War I has had enduring—and harmful—consequences.
The complicated, often conflicted, life of Alexander Herzen.
by Marco Grassi
Summer exhibitions in Florence and Verona reconsider the work of Pontormo, Rosso & Veronese.
November 12 2014
Friends and Young Friends Event: Book Launch Party with Andrew Roberts
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"