The New Criterion is probably more consistently worth reading than any other magazine in English.
What Dido did, Satan saw & O’Keeffe painted
How the humanities can come out on top in the education debate
was right!Support The
In April 1981, The New York Times Book Review published an essay by the literary theorist Geoffrey Hartman that proposed a whole different model of academic criticism. Whereas traditional criticism served the primary text, aiming to clarify, elucidate, and otherwise expound on the original, Hartman argued that “new kinds of commentary” possess an “expressive force” and mark an “inventive feat, a ‘creative’ rather than a definit ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 32 November 2013, on page 4
Copyright © 2015 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.comhttp://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/What-Dido-did--Satan-saw---O-Keeffe-painted---7728
E-mail to friend
How humanities professors are letting identity politics destroy their discipline.
A deeper look into In a Station of the Metro reveals much about Pound's development as a poet.
by David Yezzi
Poets, like journalists, historians, are after the truth. But what kind of truth, exactly, do we find in poetry?
by Paul Dean
On Cambridge University Press's seven-volume collection of Ben Jonson's works.
April 29 2015
Edmund Burke Award Gala
The Walter Duranty Prize for Journalistic Mendacity
Introduction to The Kennedy Phenomenon
The Kennedy Phenomenon: "Watching the Kennedy Train-Wreck"