The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Letters

June 2005

A naval battle

by Hal Colebatch


To the Editors:

Robert Messenger’s article on Patrick O’Brian’s naval novels (“Patrick O’Brian’s naval mastery,” May 2005) contains five errors in the first three sentences.

Three British warships are referred to as “the HMS” so-and-so. HMS stands for “His (or Her) Majestys Ship” and to refer to a British warship as “the HMS” is as gross a solecism as referring to “the Hoi Polloi.”

Frigates are not capital ships.

The actions referred to were not equal fights. Britain had, apart from a brief truce, been at war with France for more than twenty years. The British ships involved were worn-out, as were the men. They were all under-crewed. The American ships were new, better designed, larger, more strongly built and had large, well-motivated volunteer crews.

This is not said to denigrate the American achievement, which was truly magnificent, but to make a ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Hal Colebatch is

Hal G
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 23 June 2005, on page 98
Copyright © 2013 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)