The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

The Media

February 2000

Against linguistic libertarianism

by James Bowman

Opening my Washington Post to the op-ed page one day early in the new year, my eye fell on the opening sentence of David Ignatius’s column: “Sailing smoothly into this first week of the 21st century, it’s hard to see storm clouds on the horizon.” Did my eye open the paper as well as “fall”? Did the impersonal “it” do the smooth sailing for Mr. Ignatius? No in both cases. Is there any danger of your misunderstanding either my meaning or his as a result of what American high school pupils were once taught to call a “dangling participle”? Also no. So then, does this alleged mistake really matter? Nowadays, either of the two possible answers to that question is likely to follow “Of course …”

Talk about your culture wars! I belong to the “Of-course-it-does” faction, and so to the “Of-course-it-doesn’t”s I am a troglodyte and a reactionar ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

James Bowman is the author of Honor: A History (Encounter Books) and Media Madness: The Corruption of Our Political Culture, also published by Encounter (2008)
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 18 February 2000, on page 63
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)