In the hands of Picasso and Braque—the first to employ it as artistic technique—collage was a formal means of exploring and testing the limits of two-dimensionality in painting. For the Surrealists, it was, in the words of T. G. Nguyen, “a creative strategy” like the cadavre exquis, a key to unlocking the subconscious and a method of frustrating rational meaning. Because their interests were primarily epistemological—what the clash of disparate elements might mean—the Surrealists’ use of collage tended to result in jangling narrative pictures enlivened by visual puns and jokes. They came to collage by way of Dada rather than Cubism. To formalist Moderns of the Greenbergian stripe, this emphasis on narrative was a heresy, a retrograde revival of academic illusionism. Of course, we now know that, with notable exceptions, the artistic mindset of the latter half of the twentieth century was dominated not by G ...
Daniel Kunitz is
Daniel Kunitz is the U
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 20 March 2002, on page 47
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com