The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Features

September 2003

Is Max Beckmann likeable?

by Karen Wilkin

Fresh from a press preview of the Max Beckmann retrospective at MOMA, Queens,[1] I was extolling the virtues of the show to a friend I am very fond of, someone whose fierce intelligence and astonishingly well-furnished mind always delight me. Our tastes often overlap, so I was startled when my enthusiasm was met by a laconic “I don’t like Beckmann.” (We quickly began talking about something else.) Earlier that day, a colleague at the preview had announced his indifference to the painter, but I’d dismissed it, since I’ve never been impressed by this critic’s eye. Yet at the same event, the show’s curator, Robert Storr—an ardent admirer of Beckmann and, to judge by the exhibition’s notably intelligent selection, someone who really “gets” him—had described the painter as “difficult to like,” in constrast to the more appealing Pa ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Karen Wilkin is an editor at The Hudson Review and on the faculty at the New York Studio School
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 22 September 2003, on page 24
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)