The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Features

November 1999

Jorge Luis Borges & the plural I

by Eric Ormsby

It was ironic of fate, though perhaps predictable, to allow Jorge Luis Borges to develop over a long life into his own Doppelgänger. In a 1922 essay entitled “The Nothingness of Personality,” Borges asserted that “the self does not exist.” Half-a-century later, an international personality laden with acclaim, he had to depend on wry, self-deprecating quips to safeguard his precious inner nullity. “Yo no soy yo” (“I am not I”), wrote Juan Ramón Jiménez; this was a proposition that Borges not only endorsed but also made a fundamental axiom of his oeuvre. In his story “The Zahir,” written in the 1940s, he could state, “I am still, albeit only partially, Borges,” and in “Limits,” a poem from the 1964 collection aptly entitled The Self and the Other, he ended with the line (as translated by Alastair Reid), “Space, time, and Borges now ar ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Eric Ormsbys latest book is Ghazali (Oneworld)
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 18 November 1999, on page 14
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)