“Late style” is what is supposed to happen to gifted, long-lived artists. At best, it manifests itself as a bold expansion of ideas implicit in earlier work or as a reckless exploration of new possibilities. The most exciting late style works seem fearless, as if the maker’s accumulated experience of thinking about, looking at, and making art over a long working life is so powerful that it obliterates all preconceptions of what a work of art could or should be. Think of Titian’s or Rembrandt’s roughly brushed, introspective, emotionally charged paintings of their last years, which thumb their noses at sixteenth- and seventeenth-century ideas about finish, “correctness,” and touch. Think of Monet’s flickering, elusive images of his lily pond or the Japanese bridge that spanned it, which reinvent landscape painting as a dense fabric of overscaled brushstrokes and disorienting space. Or Matisse’s rigoro ...
Karen Wilkin is an editor at The Hudson Review and on the faculty at the New York Studio School
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 21 January 2003, on page 40
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com