The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Art

March 1991

The neo-Baroque: Lipchitz and de Chirico

by Jed Perl

Ovals, spirals, opulent materials, heroic ges tures: what does the modern spirit know of these essential elements of Baroque art? In veterate individualists, we cannot see pomp and grandeur as a way of life; and the idea that human experience should be framed publicly, as it often is in Baroque art, does not match up with our sense that each of us is locked inside his or her own head. The Baroque works today mostiy as a romantic metaphor, as a dream in which our private grandiosity bursts out and takes over the en tire world. Some would say this can never be a modern metaphor. And one may wonder if the later, neo-Baroque work of Jacques Lipchitz and Giorgio de Chirico ought to be called modernist, anti-modernist, or moder nism having a bad dream about itself. These are questions that Baroque forms inevitably raise when they appear in a modern context. What is missing, in the current climate, are considered answers. In December, when Borghi & Company ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Jed Perl writes about art for The New Republic
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 9 March 1991, on page 64
Copyright © 2013 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)