The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Features

November 2002

The politics of envy

by Paul Hollander

Until recently, anti-Americanism attracted little serious attention among social scientists and intellectuals. Apparently it was not considered worthy of study or close scrutiny, because it was rarely seen as a pathology that required better understanding. Unlike other more researched, consensually reprehensible attitudes and prejudices, such as racism, sexism, anti-semitism, and homophobia, anti-Americanism was regarded among the intelligentsia as a more or less natural phenomenon, perhaps regrettable but easy to explain and largely justified.

Admittedly, anti-Americanism is not easy to study given its diffuseness, varieties, endless sources, and the difficulty in locating it on the spectrum of political attitudes and positions. Anti-Americanism may be associated with radical revolutionaries or with the guardians of traditional moralities and social orders. There is anti-Americanism on the left as well as the right. Intense anti-Americanism some ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Paul Hollanders most recent book is The End of Commitment (Ivan R
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 21 November 2002, on page 14
Copyright © 2010 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)