The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Features

March 2001

The potency of pure painting: Manet's still lifes

by Karen Wilkin

On a visit to Venice, exasperated by the endless allegorical pictures and scenes from Gerusalemma Liberata and Orlando Furioso and “all that rubbish,” Edouard Manet is supposed to have told an artist friend that “a painter can say all he wants to with fruit or flowers or even clouds.” It is a straightforward statement about art-making right up there with Caravaggio’s reported assertion that “there was as much ‘workmanship’ in a still life as in a figure.” These succinct observations collapse the passage of time, offering vivid evidence that despite the seemingly unbridgeable accumulation of years separating them from each other, both Manet and his seventeenth-century predecessor were concerned with the same pragmatic, formal, hands-on issues that have always engaged serious, working painters— even serious, working painters who also happened to have changed the course of art histor ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Karen Wilkin is an editor at The Hudson Review and on the faculty at the New York Studio School
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 19 March 2001, on page 28
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)