Like the trial of O.J. Simpson, the death and funeral of Princess Diana was one of those media events which remind us of how villagelike the global village really is. The bare facts of Dianas life and accomplishments, and of the circumstances surrounding her death, were nothing but the simplest of patterns upon which fantastical embroideries of gossip and speculation, of moral praise and censure, and of (usually) hilariously bad literary and artistic invention were wovenand woven by a communal effort in which not to take part was obscurely shaming and even antisocial. Ordinary people considered it priggish or worse on the part of a few spoilsports even to refer to the princesss moral and intellectual insignificance, except as a pastime to the trivial media that live off the contemporary cult of celebrity.
Well, ordinary people had, as they so often do, a point. For one thing, the more trivial and lightweight the media, the more com ...
James Bowman is the author of Honor: A History (Encounter Books) and Media Madness: The Corruption of Our Political Culture, also published by Encounter (2008)
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 16 October 1997, on page 60
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com