The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Art

January 2001

Gallery chronicle

by Daniel Kunitz

In his paintings, R. B. Kitaj reminds me of no one so much as Saul Bellow. In addition to grand ambition and wholehearted expressivity, which often result in a certain lack of subtlety, both men caricature isms and ideas while habitually rendering human characters as comic-strip figures. To this mélange of habits, Kitaj adds another tic, that of embodying Jewish anxiety and self-obsession to the point of unintentional parody. Of course, his two-dimensional approach to ideas inflects his attitude toward Judaism: what some critics hail as allusiveness will seem to others to be mere name-dropping. But I cannot imagine Kitaj agreeing that one will find considerably more intellectual complexity in, say, a Dutch still life than in a painting of Freud or in a work such as his The Jews Are They Human? (2000), which unimaginatively offers a framed book cover from an old anti-Semitic work of the same title—whin- ing to the converted.

Ki ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Daniel Kunitz is

Daniel Kunitz is the U
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 19 January 2001, on page 51
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)