If the composer Hans Pfitzner is remembered at all today, its as a Nazi dupe, a man of considerable musical vision corrupted by his own grandiloquent dreams and a persistent sense that his genius was not properly acknowledged. Like other celebrated German musicians of his timeRichard Strauss and Wilhelm Furtwängler among themPfitzner was a respected cultural figure who opted to coexist with the Nazis. Though his nationalistic sentiments doubtless made it easier to remain in Germany once artistic freedom was squelched, Pfitzners hopes of a garlanded life under Hitler were to be dashed, for the Third Reich had little use for this particular paragon of Holy German Art.
Pfitzners postwar reputation remains blemished. History has judged his decision to toil under National Socialism a devils bargain. So why, despite our clear repudiation of Nazi politics, are we fascinated by figures such as Pfitzner? If anything, ...
David Mermelstein writes about classical music for The New York Times
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 16 September 1997, on page 53
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com