Publishing a paper in a respected journal marks the culmination of successful scientific research, and in this age of genome-scale analyses and Internet-fuelled information overload, scientists still go about this process in much the same way as in decades past. The manuscript is submitted to a journal for peer reviewthe optimistic researcher will begin with prestigious journals, working down if the paper is declinedand, once accepted, the article is revised and published, accessible to subscribers of a particular journal. This traditional system, outwardly benign, has become ill-suited to its purpose of the disseminating scientific information.
As academic scientists, we take pride in the sovereignty of our research, and our ability freely to publish and communicate our results. Yet we submit to a cartel that privatizes our findings and compels us to buy back access to these results. We accept that access to our papers will be available onl ...
Michael Seringhaus
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 22 July 2004, on page 0
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com