Is it possible to write about an exhibition at the Whitney Museum of American Art without commenting on the institution itself? If lamenting the dismal state of affairs at the Whitney has become tiresome, it is no less so than that which the museum routinely proffers as art. What is surprising, then, about Kienholz: A Retrospective is not that it almost didnt happen, but that it didnt happen sooner.[1] Although he had been working for over forty years, Edward Kienholzwho died in 1994 at the age of sixty-sixcould be considered the quintessential artist for the Whitney of the 1990s, a museum partial to (as a colleague has it) the school of puke, pus, piss, and politics. This is an unfortunate turn of phrase but one that sums up the Whitneys criteria for art all too well. It sums up Kienholz: A Retrospective pretty well too.
The title of the exhibition refers not only to Edward K ...
Mario Naves is an artist and critic who live and works in New York City
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 14 April 1996, on page 44
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com