The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Art

November 1998

Mark Rothko at the Whitney

by Mario Naves

In the Spring 1998 issue of Modern Painters, the painter Trevor Winkfield described Abstract Expressionism “as a monolith” that has been “accorded a reverential deference which … seems a mite slavish, if not downright unhealthy.” Winkfield was writing about the New York School’s domination of the standard histories of American art, and the other (often eccentric) artists who all but disappear beneath its shadow. The myth of Abstract Expressionism—with its cadre of ambitious artists and their conquest over the School of Paris—is of Promethean proportions, and the authority Abstract Expressionism holds over the art world is by no means diminished today. Many artists rue it as the last time serious art was, indeed, serious; others see it as a cultural nemesis—a patriarchal and nationalistic bugaboo—in need of deconstruction. Abstract Expressionism, epic and immovable, is a historical and artistic mom ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Mario Naves is an artist and critic who live and works in New York City
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 17 November 1998, on page 52
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)