The incongruity put forth by the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in its recent overlapping of exhibitions devoted to Kazimir Malevich (1878-1935), the pioneering Russian abstractionist, and Matthew Barney, a pioneer in the public misuse of vaseline, has been much remarked upon. The incongruity was so great that one would have to to have undergone a staggering feat of self-restraint not to comment upon it. Here, after all, are two figures who exemplify the disparity between Modernism and Post-Modernism, high art and popular culture, the Guggenheim as we have come to know it and what used to be called the Museum for Nonobjective Art. One is tempted to peg the museum’s current incarnation as the New! Improved! Guggenheim because such terminology underscores how thoroughly the institution has co-opted the methodologies of commerce.
Such an approach may be fitting when applied to Barney, whose theatrical sensationalism puts him more in the company ...
This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase
Log in
