Its difficult to believe, given the current high reputation of Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (15711610), that he was ever considered to be anything but one of the great figures of Italian painting. To his contemporaries, his horrifying, voluptuous religious dramascinematic stagings of crucial instants in the lives of saints and martyrs, briefly illuminated for a rapt audience by shafts of dazzling lightseemed the most exciting work of the time; witness the numbers of painters who assiduously followed his lead. Today, even though they are in many ways paradigmatic of the values of the fiercely religious Counter-Reformation Rome where Caravaggio mainly worked, from about 1590 to 1606, his paintings bear witness to an individual struggle between official pieties and personal observation that seems timeless. Yet, from the mid-seventeenth century until about fifty years ago, Caravaggio would not have been included in a list of meg ...
Karen Wilkin is an editor at The Hudson Review and on the faculty at the New York Studio School
more from this author
This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 18 February 2000, on page 42
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com