The New Criterion
(Mobile Version)

Features

November 1997

Complexity & contradiction: Virginia Woolf & George Eliot

by Brooke Allen

Writing of the life of Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1927, Virginia Woolf observed that “there are some stories which have to be retold by each generation, not that we have anything new to add to them, but because of some queer quality in them which makes them not only Shelley’s story but our own.” This has proved true for the lives of any number of great men and women over the past few centuries: it has been true for no one, perhaps, as much as for Virginia Woolf herself.

In the opening of her comprehensive new biography of Woolf, British scholar Hermione Lee lists a few first sentences of other Woolf biographies: “‘Virginia Woolf was a Miss Stephen’ ‘Virginia Woolf was a sexually abused child: she was an incest survivor’ ‘Was Virginia Woolf “insane”?’ ‘Was Virginia Woolf mad?’”[1] Etcetera, etcetera. “What no longer seems possible,” Lee writes, “is to start ...

This article is available to subscribers and for individual purchase

Log in

Brooke Allens latest book is Moral Minority: Our Skeptical Founding Fathers (Ivan R Dee)
more from this author


This article originally appeared in The New Criterion, Volume 16 November 1997, on page 25
Copyright © 2012 The New Criterion | www.newcriterion.com


E-mail to friend(s)