Weblog
About ArmaVirumque ( AHR-mah wih-ROOM-kweh) In the Aeneid, the Roman poet Virgil sang of "arms and a man" (Arma virumque cano). Month in and month out, The New Criterion expounds with great clarity and wit on the art, culture, and political controversies of our times. With postings of reviews, essays, links, recs, and news, Armavirumque seeks to continue this mission in accordance with the timetable of the digital age. Recent posts
Archives more archives Info
Recent contributors
Shortcut
To contact The New Criterion by email, write to: letters@newcriterion.com.To contact The New Criterion by mail, write to: The New Criterion 900 Broadway Suite 602 New York, New York 10003 USA
Blogroll
Sep 02, 2008 03:48 PM by Stefan Beck
According to a New Yorker profile of Christopher Hitchens, “Many guests can report seeing [him] step out of the room after dinner, write a column, then step back almost before the topic of conversation has changed.” Pretty speedy—and yet not even he can keep up with the rapid succession of pseudo-scandals setting up camp in the popular imagination. With coverage like this of the newest member of the Palin family, does he really think anyone wants to revisit McCain’s condominium conundrum? Probably not, but they ought to. Hitchens’s piece offers a few examples of what the great Joyce Cary called “tumbrel remarks,” which are “unguarded comment[s] by an uncontrollably rich person, of such crass insensitivity that it makes the workers and peasants think of lampposts and guillotines.” The late queen mother, being driven in a Rolls-Royce through a stricken district of Manchester, England, said as she winced at the view, “I see no point at all in being poor.” The Duke of St. Albans once told an interviewer that an ancestor of his had lost about 50 million pounds in a foolish speculation in South African goldfields, adding after a pause, “That was a lot of money in those days.” The Duke of Devonshire, having been criticized in the London Times, announced in an annoyed and plaintive tone that he would no longer have the newspaper “in any of my houses.” Hitchens offers these examples in order to show why McCain’s ignorance of “how many houses he owns” was (a) not a “tumbrel remark” at all and (b) completely irrelevant, anyway. “Every four years,” he writes, “we suddenly discover that the only people worth noticing or mentioning in the United States are those who are ill, or unemployed, or uninsured, or underpaid, or homeless, or some combination of the above.” Whatever one thinks of McCain, it can only be a service to American politics to reject this dishonest (or is it honestly resentful?) approach to success. Topsy-turvy as it sounds, it just may be that those best equipped to solve a problem for the nation are those who have solved it first for themselves.
E-mail to friend
|
Subscriber login
 The New Criterion is now optimized for Mobile Devices Already a print subscriber? click for online access New from The New Criterion: ‘Free speech in 
Webcasts
The Milt Rosenberg Show: Free Speech in an age of Jihad
Roger Kimball on liberalism's response to Islam
Encounter Books at 10, an interview with Roger Simon |
add a comment
you must be a new criterion subscriber to post a comment. {subscribe now}