Weblog
About ArmaVirumque ( AHR-mah wih-ROOM-kweh) In the Aeneid, the Roman poet Virgil sang of "arms and a man" (Arma virumque cano). Month in and month out, The New Criterion expounds with great clarity and wit on the art, culture, and political controversies of our times. With postings of reviews, essays, links, recs, and news, Armavirumque seeks to continue this mission in accordance with the timetable of the digital age. Recent posts
Archives more archives Info
Recent contributors
Shortcut
To contact The New Criterion by email, write to: letters@newcriterion.com.To contact The New Criterion by mail, write to: The New Criterion 900 Broadway Suite 602 New York, New York 10003 USA
Blogroll
Apr 27, 2005 04:25 PM by Stefan Beck
In 1947, MGM negotiated with Evelyn Waugh for the film rights to Brideshead Revisited. Waugh was deeply suspicious of Hollywood. He referred to its denizens as "Californian savages" and lampooned them memorably in The Loved One. Hollywood didn’t much like Waugh, either: MGM proved completely unwilling to consider a Brideshead that was, as Waugh demanded, more theological meditation than romance. The deal soured, and there was no film. Three decades later, a marvelous television miniseries was produced. That’d be the end of that, then, eh? The masterpiece had miraculously escaped ruin. Well, not so fast. A while back we mentioned a new version in the works. Today we learn that A lavish new big-screen adaptation of Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited has a script, cast and even locations - but no director. David Yates (Sex Traffic) was slated to make it, but then Warners asked him to direct the new Harry Potter film, and he pulled out. "We’re looking for a new director now so that we can hopefully go into production next year," says Douglas Ray of the production company Ecosse Films. But who? It seems that directors from all over are being considered.The sacred and profane memoirs of Captain Charles Ryder? We’ll just have the profane ones, thanks; we can do without all that other unpleasantness about sin, grace, and the soul. One wonders what the story of the affair, isolated from all that leads up to it, stripped of its theological and therefore emotional dimensions, will have to offer an audience. Silver screen steam in period dress? Don’t we already have PBS for that sort of thing? In a 1963 Paris Review interview, Waugh said, "I used to have a rule when I reviewed books as a young man never to give an unfavorable notice to a book I hadn’t read." Well, call it intuition, but somehow I don’t think I need extend that courtesy to this film. I sincerely hope that that director’s chair stays empty: this is all the Brideshead I need.
E-mail to friend
|
Subscriber login
 The New Criterion is now optimized for Mobile Devices Already a print subscriber? click for online access New from The New Criterion: ‘Free speech in 
Webcasts
The Milt Rosenberg Show: Free Speech in an age of Jihad
Roger Kimball on liberalism's response to Islam
Encounter Books at 10, an interview with Roger Simon |
add a comment
you must be a new criterion subscriber to post a comment. {subscribe now}