The New Criterion

America’s leading review of the arts and intellectual life
- Harry Mount, the London Telegraph

Weblog

About ArmaVirumque


( AHR-mah wih-ROOM-kweh)


In the Aeneid, the Roman poet Virgil sang of "arms and a man" (Arma virumque cano). Month in and month out, The New Criterion expounds with great clarity and wit on the art, culture, and political controversies of our times. With postings of reviews, essays, links, recs, and news, Armavirumque seeks to continue this mission in accordance with the timetable of the digital age.


Recent posts

Archives


Archive for August 2008

Archive for July 2008

Archive for June 2008

more archives

 

Info

 

Recent contributors

 

Shortcut

www.armavirumque.org

 

To contact The New Criterion by email, write to:

letters@newcriterion.com.

To contact The New Criterion by mail, write to:

The New Criterion

900 Broadway

Suite 602

New York, New York 10003

USA

 

Blogroll



Feb 24, 2005 03:06 PM

Email alert

by James Panero


I have set my email system to delete incoming messages with the subject line ’gates.’ I have also set about designing a similar spam blocker for the culture at large. If people have never felt the need to think about art before two weeks ago, I maintain that we do not have a responsibility to listen to their dissertations now. If it takes so many tons of orange plastic in their back yard to get people going on art, maybe art isn’t their subject. Gary Condit or Scott Peterson might make better areas of inquiry for them. Friends, let’s take art out of the water cooler conversation and put it back in the galleries and museums where it belongs. I suggest you implement similar email safeguards for your computer.

"What is art?" they ask coyly. Answer: if they have to ask, they’ll never know.

UPDATE: Hilton Kramer has the final word in this week’s New York Observer:

About the bright orange gates that have lately been erected in a defenseless Central Park in the name of art, there are no neutral opinions. Everyone has either seen or heard about this massive assault on the most beloved of the city�s parks, and everyone has formed some sort of opinion on the worth or worthlessness of this extravagant and somewhat absurd episode in our urban history. My own view is that the gates are nothing less than an unforgivable defacement of a public treasure, and everyone responsible for promoting it�including our publicity-seeking Mayor�should be held accountable, not only for supporting bad taste but for violating public trust.
Read it all here.

comments, click to read

E-mail to friend

add a comment

you must be a new criterion subscriber to post a comment. {subscribe now}

Subscriber login

The New Criterion

Already a print subscriber? click for online access

login

Remember:

New from The New Criterion:
40 page special issue
on our conference

‘Free speech in
an age of Jihad’

Webcasts

Encounter Books at 10, an interview with Roger Simon


'The Face of Libel Tourism,' OPENING REMARKS AND PANEL ONE from Free Speech in an Age of Jihad:
Libel Tourism, “Hate Speech,” and Political Freedom a conference held by The New Criterion and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies


'Suppressing Discussion of Islam,' PANEL TWO from Free Speech in an Age of Jihad:
Libel Tourism, “Hate Speech,” and Political Freedom a conference held by The New Criterion and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies

Go to webcasts >

Events

October 22, 2008

GALA EVENT: The New Criterion Benefit Art Auction


January 25, 2009

TRAVEL EVENT: The New Criterion Cruise


More events >