One column and you're drunk.

As if fulfilling some preordained mission of total impoverishment -- political and literary -- the New York Times writer once more takes up his worst subject, Iran. Bertie Wooster once referred to a roll as tasting as though it had been made by one of the nastier-minded members of the Borgia family. He should have tried this:

I was too disgusted — by the media merry-go-round, by more incendiary provocations from Ahmadinejad, and by the sterility of an Iran debate that turns in the tight circle formed by fear-mongering, ignorance and the ghastly stew of Western carrots and sticks.

A debate turning in a tight circle formed by a stew of carrots and sticks must be anything but sterile.

But Cohen isn't finished (except in the metaphorical sense):

Iran is a paper tiger, a postmodern threat: It has many uses but a third Western war against a Muslim country is a bridge too far.

I can't tell if this is more insulting to the reader or to the dissidents surely wondering about the poststructuralist narrative of being jailed, executed and raped in Iranian prisons. 

Ahmadinejad, a breakfast companion of Cohen, is also described as 'all hat, no cattle,' and a 'bogeyman out of Central Casting'. Are cliches the new deterrence? 

A Message from the Editors

Our past successes are owed to our greatest ambassadors: our readers. Our future rests on your support, as The New Criterion Editor Roger Kimball explains. Will you help us continue to bring our incisive review of the arts and culture to the next generation of readers?